TweeterGetter – A Failed Experiment, But Not Harmful

Written by | Posted in News | Posted on Date 03-03-2009 | Comments 6 Comments
Tags: , ,

Well, it is a day later than I was going to blog on my 5 day experiment with TweeterGetter. For those who are just reading about this, I blogged almost a week ago about TweeterGetter in the article “TweeterGetter – Is It Really Worth Your Time?”

In the beginning I lost only a dozen followers after sending the link out. However, I got most of those back after I sent a tweet out on Twitter warning them about the experiment. I noticed that the 6 people before me listed in Tweetergetter did follow me.

Afterwards, I did not notice any difference in my normal intake of followers a day. Usually these people follow me due to a similar interest or when I give WordPress tips and help. Some follow because they like my blog. However, TweeterGetter did nothing. I got 6 followers from the site.

My issue is that there waswas to see if TweeterGetter was considered the evil scheme that others have called it. No, it is not. It does not hack anyone or collect information. No money was exchanged, therefore it cannot be called a ponzi scheme. You can unfollow anyone you chose. Really, TweeterGetter filled the ‘follow bank’ of its creator.

As for the questions I wanted to find out:

  • 1. What type of people are following me? There were no difference in followers than normal and those that did not match my interests I either blocked or did not follow. All 6 before me that followed were interested in social media and business.
  • 2. Did I make any new meaningful connections through this? I make meaningful connections daily, but none starting with any that may have followed through TweeterGetter. I had only a few DM (direct message) exchanges with 3 of the 6 that did follow.
  • 3. What type of people did I unfollow? Some were adult related or explicit material.
  • >4. What type of feedback have I drawn in testing this out? Not much feedback other than a few saying that it was a scheme and they wanted to avoid it. I have not had any backlash.
  • 5. Did it work? No. Not really unless you count 6 as being significant, but according to TweeterGetter, this would be a failure.
  • 6. Was the venture really worth it at all? No. It was not worth it. If the site promised it, then it should have worked only one time. You would have to constantly plug the produced TweeterGetter link into your Twitter stream to get it to work. However, you could possibly lose those followers that you may talk to regularly.

I do not find this as a disappointment. I had a feeling it would not work.

Related posts:

  1. TweeterGetter – Is It Really Worth Your Time?
  2. MyTweetFollowers: Experiment Conclusion
  3. Follow Frenzy with MyTweetFollowers.com?

About Nile Flores

Nile is 30 year old female from Southern Illinois. Nile is a mother of 1 son. She is also a web and graphic designer, who exclusively designs using WordPress. She is currently a student working for a Bachelors in Business. She also blogs at WPAddict.net and FamousBloggers.net

Connect with Nile at: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

Nile has written 602 articles at Blondish.net.

Comment Policy

Please do not leave just keywords for your name. You will no longer be approved if you do unless that it is your Intense Debate username. The correct way to leave your name is YOUR NAME @ YOUR KEYWORD if you choose to use a keyword.

Comments (6)

  • Nile Flores says:

    New blog post: TweeterGetter – A Failed Experiment, But Not Harmful http://tinyurl.com/bj6n8v

  • Darin Hadley says:

    RT @blondishnet: New blog post: TweeterGetter – A Failed Experiment, But Not Harmful http://tinyurl.com/bj6n8v

  • Twitter Comment


    New blog post: TweeterGetter – A Failed Experiment, But Not Harmful [link to post]

    – Posted using Chat Catcher

  • Peter Lunk says:

    RT @Garymccaffrey Sorry about the tweetergetter crap yall… seems to be a hoax… http://tinyurl.com/tweetcrap TAKE THAT SHIT OFFLINE !

  • MrLunk says:

    Lunk’d it on my twitter !

    That crap should go offline …

    may twitter users trust external tools with passwords this F%#’s up that trust towards goodwilling open developers and platforms .

    suckage level 4 stars

    You’ve been Lunk’d !

    MrLunk’s last blog post..MrLunk: RT @Garymccaffrey Sorry about the tweetergetter crap yall… seems to be a hoax… http://tinyurl.com/tweetcrap TAKE THAT SHIT OFFLINE !

  • LeanneBoyd says:

    Like any shining star, Twitter has soared to the heavens of social media… and we’ve seen many who would love to ride their coat tails to success. This is nothing new, as it has happened in the art worlds forever. They attach, hoping to gain some of the glory, fame, or money. Twitter has caused a huge upsurge in small entities developing “tools,” some of which are very good, and most of which, I say Ho Hum. During my first month on Twitter, I sought out followers. I concentrated on those in my niche area of web design, graphics, Flash… but there were other shiny toys I found, too. For the past couple of months, however, things have settled in to very natural growth. I don’t pay much attention to the Twitter tools popping up. This is, after all, a “social thing.” And I’m handling almost all of this manually. Hard work? Yes. Time consuming? Yes. Worth it for my business? YES. I’m seeing that Twitter will only grow more valuable every day.

    LeanneBoyd’s last blog post..Make Money Online Very Fast With Different Marketing Techniques

  • Write a comment

    CommentLuv badge