<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Usernames And Social Network Policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blondish.net/usernames-and-social-network-policies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blondish.net/usernames-and-social-network-policies/</link>
	<description>Rock Your Site Like A Rockstar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:18:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Santiago</title>
		<link>http://blondish.net/usernames-and-social-network-policies/#comment-85176</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Santiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 05:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blondish.net/?p=2384#comment-85176</guid>
		<description>Interesting and educating information…..Facebook’s new username policy unveiled on 13 June 2009 puts more emphasize and allows users to create personalized username for their Facebook pages. Maybe this could be an opportunity for Trademark owners but a little risk could be there. Any unrelated person could use the owner’s marks as username without any license or authorization. This new policy is based on Fist Come &amp; First Serve…..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and educating information…..Facebook’s new username policy unveiled on 13 June 2009 puts more emphasize and allows users to create personalized username for their Facebook pages. Maybe this could be an opportunity for Trademark owners but a little risk could be there. Any unrelated person could use the owner’s marks as username without any license or authorization. This new policy is based on Fist Come &amp; First Serve…..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nile</title>
		<link>http://blondish.net/usernames-and-social-network-policies/#comment-74375</link>
		<dc:creator>Nile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blondish.net/?p=2384#comment-74375</guid>
		<description>Agreed! I really think this is just a bit too much. I do see the other side where people who try to squat on usernames to possibly get money, but in all honesty... I still am not all that keen on the trademark as there are only so many ways to call any business. It gets ridiculous sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed! I really think this is just a bit too much. I do see the other side where people who try to squat on usernames to possibly get money, but in all honesty&#8230; I still am not all that keen on the trademark as there are only so many ways to call any business. It gets ridiculous sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @wikiLeon</title>
		<link>http://blondish.net/usernames-and-social-network-policies/#comment-74339</link>
		<dc:creator>@wikiLeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blondish.net/?p=2384#comment-74339</guid>
		<description>This whole thing reminds me of the Mike Roe incident. Depending on who the larger company tries to go after, they&#039;ll risk the Streisand Effect. I agree with Charity. As long as its not trademarked or if you are not trying to impersonate another person, usernames should not be usurped. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole thing reminds me of the Mike Roe incident. Depending on who the larger company tries to go after, they&#039;ll risk the Streisand Effect. I agree with Charity. As long as its not trademarked or if you are not trying to impersonate another person, usernames should not be usurped. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blondish.net/usernames-and-social-network-policies/#comment-66991</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blondish.net/?p=2384#comment-66991</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Intensedebate by : As long as the username you want is not trademarked or offensive, I do not think they should be allowed to remove or reclaim it - especially if your username is actually a part of your legal name. I tend to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Intensedebate by : As long as the username you want is not trademarked or offensive, I do not think they should be allowed to remove or reclaim it &#8211; especially if your username is actually a part of your legal name. I tend to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blondishnet</title>
		<link>http://blondish.net/usernames-and-social-network-policies/#comment-66930</link>
		<dc:creator>blondishnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blondish.net/?p=2384#comment-66930</guid>
		<description>I think that is why the user who had been involved in the recent Facebook username incident got his back. You make a good point. That is the reason I put my url in there too. Unfortunately, for some of my older social network profiles, unless I delete them and start over, I will be able to re-brand them. I probably should to keep consistent, but it is not like I have not made myself invisible...rofl. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is why the user who had been involved in the recent Facebook username incident got his back. You make a good point. That is the reason I put my url in there too. Unfortunately, for some of my older social network profiles, unless I delete them and start over, I will be able to re-brand them. I probably should to keep consistent, but it is not like I have not made myself invisible&#8230;rofl. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: blondish.net @ 2012-05-23 23:40:58 by W3 Total Cache -->
